1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
2 years ago
13

Grant’s policy to win the war was one of what

History
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

You might be interested in
What is a temple with columns
tigry1 [53]
A Greek temple , if this is what you mean . Hope I helped
4 0
3 years ago
In the Second Industrial Revolution , what innovations opened up new industrial frontiers?
vova2212 [387]
The rapid production of steel and steel mills lead to innovations such as skyscrapers. Also during this time, electricity became more abundant, leading to things such as telephones. Automobiles also started to be created.
4 0
3 years ago
01.4 Explain two Christian teachings about the incarnation.
krok68 [10]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Two Christian teachings about the incarnation are the following.

The idea of incarnation in the New Testament of the Bible teaches Christian followers that God sent his only son, Jesus, to Earth to save his people. This is the most important idea of incarnation, that God, who loves humanity, sent his son to be the example and the teacher to save humans for all their sins, according to Christianity.

Then we have references, for instance, John 1:14, which says that the incarnation of Jesus is the lesson that Jesus is the essence of God made flesh, which menas, God transformed into a human.

That is how Christians understand that Jesus was born and incarnated as a human being for 33 years on life on planet Earth. This is part of the lesson to humans in that Jesus, as a human, could felt and suffer as any human can do.

8 0
3 years ago
Help me please i am very stuck
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Maybe last one

Explanation:

Usually when it says all of the above or something like that it's the answer if not maybe C?

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does paleolithic mean and when was it?​
shutvik [7]

Answer:

relating to or denoting the early phase of the Stone Age, lasting about 2.5 million years, when primitive stone implements were used. The Paleolithic Age refers to a time period in history, from approximately 2.6 million years ago to roughly 10,000 years ago.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Neanderthals of Europe were branch of what hominid group
    11·1 answer
  • How can U.S. capitalist system be classified?
    6·2 answers
  • Why do scientists belive the first inhabitants crossed the land bridge
    11·1 answer
  • The Judiciary Act of 1789 established what kind of legal system? a. congressional law c. federal court system b. international c
    14·1 answer
  • Why does this app exist‍♀️
    8·1 answer
  • I was in command of the continental army of Sartoga
    14·1 answer
  • What were two major criticisms of fdr's new deal economic policies?
    8·1 answer
  • PLSSSS HELPPPP PLSSSSS 25 PIONTS PLSSSS HELPPPPP
    5·1 answer
  • Before the passage of the Indian Removal Act, some Plains Native American tribes BLANK to Indian territory. these tribes were of
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Think about what you have read about the new ideas of the 1950s. (You may
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!