1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
2 years ago
13

Grant’s policy to win the war was one of what

History
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

You might be interested in
What are two cultural changes that the Spanish forced on native Latin America’s
navik [9.2K]
Language (Spanish) and they forced brutal rule which also included a bit of slavery
6 0
4 years ago
If Texans wish to amend the Texas Bill of Rights, which of these requirements is one they must meet?
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

I believe its A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are two advantages for Britain in prohibiting colonists from moving west of the Appalachian Mountains?
marin [14]
The two advantages for Britain in prohibiting colonists from moving west of the Appalachian Mountains are...

1. Settlement
2. Proclamation
6 0
3 years ago
(PLZ ANSWER ASAP) A Texas History teacher wrote these bullet points on the whiteboard. What was the most likely topic of discuss
deff fn [24]

Answer:

b.

Explanation:

It wouldn't be A because they all aren't scientific discoveries.

It wouldn't be C because barbed wire and windmills do not fall under the communication category.

It wouldn't be D because windmills are not transportation.

7 0
4 years ago
Why did the United States go to war against Iraq in 2003
Kazeer [188]

A look at the rationales for going to war in Iraq, from WMD and terrorism to democracy in the Middle East. Americans were told by President Bush and his administration that the U.S. was going to war with Iraq because of the imminent threat of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and ties to terrorism.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the lesson, what brought about the need for social reform?A:too many new immigrants.B:rapid growth of large cities
    8·2 answers
  • Why is the 1920's considered the first decade of the modern era
    7·1 answer
  • How were African Americans and women discriminated against in the North in the mid 1800s?
    9·1 answer
  • Improvements to transportation have
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the Islamic Empires begin to decline? A. Annexing too much land at once B. Infighting and weak governments C. The impact
    7·1 answer
  • What were some of the negative consequences of the TVA's activities?
    9·1 answer
  • Conclusion on should the U.S police the world?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Salvation Army, the YMHA, the YMCA, and the YMCA have in common?
    7·1 answer
  • How are the legislative and executive branches of the U.S. government different from each another?
    13·2 answers
  • Describe the old US policy toward Indians
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!