The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In political studies, globalization has changed the way countries and companies approach different aspects of trade and other kinds of interaction. Ideologies still persist, but one of the effects of globalization is that people are leaving their belief systems and culture behind in others to be part of an integrated market or integrated community without borders, Technology and the Internet have played a major role in doing that.
Concepts such as Eco-politics and human rights have been playing a more prominent role in recent times because today it is so much more difficult to hide things such as the violation of human rights or the damage many corporations do to the environment.
Modern times have allowed the connection of people through the internet and social media, so people can talk directly no matter frontiers, languages, or distance.
So any issues that happen in one part of the world that can be of public concern can be noticed and communicated instantly so the whole world can be aware.
Answer:
trump, war, hatred, bigotry
Explanation:
- tamor
- arunriver
are two pilgrimage in province no. 1
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
<span>he nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining individual differences in physical and behavioral traits. The philosophy that humans acquire all or most of their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). Nature refers to an individual's innate qualities, while nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism).</span>