Answer:
The anwser you are looking for is number 2
Step-by-step explanation:
It looks like your equations are
7M - 2t = -30
5t - 12M = 115
<u>Solving by substitution</u>
Solve either equation for one variable. For example,
7M - 2t = -30 ⇒ t = (7M + 30)/2
Substitute this into the other equation and solve for M.
5 × (7M + 30)/2 - 12M = 115
5 (7M + 30) - 24M = 230
35M + 150 - 24M = 230
11M = 80
M = 80/11
Now solve for t.
t = (7 × (80/11) + 30)/2
t = (560/11 + 30)/2
t = (890/11)/2
t = 445/11
<u>Solving by elimination</u>
Multiply both equations by an appropriate factor to make the coefficients of one of the variables sum to zero. For example,
7M - 2t = -30 ⇒ -10t + 35M = -150 … (multiply by 5)
5t - 12M = 115 ⇒ 10t - 24M = 230 … (multiply by 2)
Now combining the equations eliminates the t terms, and
(-10t + 35M) + (10t - 24M) = -150 + 230
11M = 80
M = 80/11
It follows that
7 × (80/11) - 2t = -30
560/11 - 2t = -30
2t = 890/11
t = 445/11
Answer:
f=100
Step-by-step explanation:
Tomas used incorrectly the rule of signs, the expression should be simplified as follows:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
-2.6 -5.4 = 8
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What mistake did Tomas likely make?</h3>
Here Tomas wants to perform an addition between two numbers:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
And the outcome that Tomas gets is:
-2.6 + (-5.4) = 2.8
Here his mistake seems to bee that he thought the second number was a positive number, and he solved the operation:
-2.6 + 5.4
So, he used wrong the rule of signs.
Remember that the rule of signs says that:
(-)*(+) = (+)*(-) = (-)
Using that, we can rewrite the original expression:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
to:
-2.6 - 5.4
Solving that, we get:
-2.6 - 5.4 = -8
Which is the outcome that Tomas would have gotten if he had used correctly the rule of signs.
If you want to learn more about the rule of signs:
brainly.com/question/13333620
#SPJ1
Answer:
my bad yall, I seen the comments!! it's 12
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm so sorry!!
