Answer: perform in-between meeting tasks(A)
Explanation:
The plan-do-check-act (PDCA) is a four-step method that is used in business and organizations for the control and improvement of the processes and products
A in PDCA stands for Act and it means to take action based on what one has learned in the study. In a case whereby the change does not work, own should go through the cycle again using a different plan.
In cases were one is successful, the person should incorporate what has been learned from the test into broader changes.
The "act" part of the PDCA cycle is used to perform in-between meeting tasks.
Answer:
the last part of the question is missing, so I looked for it:
a. Randy received $2,200 of interest this year and no other investment income or expenses. His AGI is $75,000.
b. Randy had no investment income this year, and his AGI is $75,000.
a) Randy can deduct $31,575:
- the mortgage interest is deductible
- the car loan interest is not deductible
- he can deduct $4,725 - $2,200 = $2,525 as investment interest expense
b) Randy can deduct $29,050
- the mortgage interest is deductible
- the car loan interest is not deductible
- since he had no investment revenue, he cannot deduct any investment interest expense
<span>In 1972, computer scientist Gordon Bell recognized that digital devices would change the world as they evolved and became widely used.
</span>Gordon Bell was an American electrical engineer and manager.<span> He was responsible for the first mini- and timesharing computers and is famous for his development of DEC's highly-successful VAX architecture.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": number of firms in an industry.
Explanation:
A concentration ratio measures the number of competitors within the same industry. The lowest concentration ratio of a firm, it represents there are more market rivals. The highest the concentration ratio, the lower the number of competitors of the firm. The ratio is expressed in percentage terms. A firm having a 100% concentration ratio is a monopoly.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
