Are you asking which parts of medicare they need to be enrolled in? If so, I believe the answer is Medicare Part A or Parts A and B.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is a) the inflation differential.
Explanation:
Inflation differential is the difference we can find between two countries in exchange rates. The inflation differential can produce losses for the company if, in the country you want to buy, there is a big difference in your exchange rate, since this raises the prices of the product. As a result, the company has a loss; it can also happen if It is a case of exports.
If the inflation differential is maintained for an extended period, it can cause loss of competitiveness, since the profit margin of the products would be affected.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is $27,675.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Variable manufacturing OH = $1.75
Fixed manufacturing OH = $19,800
Units = 4,500 units
So, we can calculate the total amount of manufacturing overhead cost by using following formula:
Total manufacturing OH = Total variable OH + Total fixed OH
Where, Total variable OH = $1.75 × 4,500 = $7,875
By putting the value, we get
Total Manufacturing OH = $7,875 + $19,800
= $27,675
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
