1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitriy789 [7]
3 years ago
14

Why do you think the Iroquois may have preferred to be neutral between the conflict of France and England? What can you infer ab

out how the Iroquois felt about the European conflicts in North America?
Social Studies
1 answer:
kipiarov [429]3 years ago
3 0
The iroquois weren't exactly pleased with the conflicts in north america. one- they were already on their land and had claimed it their own without helping any native americans out, and two- both (english and the french) were starting more problems in their land. 
You might be interested in
What was one important goal of the Monroe Doctrine?
Ludmilka [50]
To turn European colonialism away from America
4 0
3 years ago
Who is the most famous pilot of the lockheed vega 5b?
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer: Amelia Earhart

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Answer the following questions:
kramer

Explanation:

uses of air is for breathing,for plant to grow

and air pollution can cause global warming that is really harmful

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rules of behavior that are defined both formally and informally are
EleoNora [17]
Rules of behavior that are defined both formally and informally are norms. 
Norms refer to rules - rules that need to be followed if we want to be accepted by our community. Failing to follow such rules will make the community fear us, or ostracize us if we don't conform. Norms can either be written (when they become laws), or they can be informal norms which are just known to exist, but aren't actually written anywhere specifically. 
5 0
3 years ago
Explain the influence, power, and limits of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Doss [256]

Answer:The power is mostly influence, and the influence is mostly moral. That is, the Declaration is actually pretty nebulous, subject to interpretation, and routinely violated. This then is its limits. Any country that wants to violate the Declaration, even after signing it, usually can with few or no consequences.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The right to filibuster is governed by senate rule 22 <br> a. True <br> b. False
    11·1 answer
  • What president made thanksgiving a national holiday
    11·1 answer
  • After the victory at Saratoga, which country was convinced that the Americans could win the war with Britain?
    14·1 answer
  • How does the world systems theory explain global inequality?
    14·1 answer
  • In 1933, Hitler was appointed the ??
    6·2 answers
  • Nuclear power provides France with __________ of its energy. A. one-quarter B. one-half C. two-thirds D. three-quarters
    8·2 answers
  • By the war’s end who was being recruited to fill the confederate lines? (Civil war) NO LINKS!!
    9·2 answers
  • Identify and explain some similarities between prehistoric humans and humans today​
    15·1 answer
  • Please give me a explanation for the answer
    12·2 answers
  • The encoding specificity principle is a hypothesis that states:.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!