Answer:
Yes this is against the Indian constitution.
Explanation:
This is actually against the constitution. The Constitution has made provision for equal rights to the law for everybody. All the citizens of India are equal before law. There is also equal protection of law to all by the Constitution. The constitution provides for the safety of its citizens and ensures everyone is accorded justice.
The Constitution does not provide for a minister to misuse his power. The minister misuses his power by asking the police not to register case against his relatives. and thus the later can not ask a police officer not to register a complaint against his relative. This is not in accordance with the principle of equality.
Nietzsche, the German philosopher, is well-known by his sentence “god is dead”. This words should not be taken literally since what Nietzsche wanted to say was that he never believed in God so he (God) could have never died as he never existed, so this sentence is a metaphor. Nietzsche wanted to express that the Christian God is no longer the believable source of faith of absolute moral principles.
Nietzsche was an atheist during his adult life, so he never believed in God’s existence. Throughout his sentence, Nietzsche express not only the fact that God died, but also the fact that the human being killed him with the purpose of reaching a greater understanding of the universe. In other words, when the human being question himself, he killed God. But, for Nietzsche, the dead of God unleashes a certain crisis since society was born and established with these moral principles.
With that being said, the “overman” is understood by Nietzsche as the person who is able to create his/her own principle’s system by identifying as “good” everything that proceeds from his/her own genuine will of power. Thus, traditional principles represented by Christianism subdue the weakest people to a “slave morality”. Nietzsche thought these principles should disappear in order to find new ones that could represent his prototype of the ideal human being, “the overman”.
Explanation:
Its the fundamental tenet of Muslims that all those who do not believe in Allah, are infidels and do not deserve to live. Same was the case when the Muslims came invading India, they gave two options: to convert or die! Later on the Muslims diluted their “killing" options to “extra tax" or “protection money". The long Muslim rule over a large part of India with such inhuman rules have caused deep resentment among the Hindus who survive today.
Although, the Muslims got their own nation based on religion, a large number of Muslims consider themselves as Indians and live in harmony with the Hindus.
Presently, rarely any case of forcible conversion from Hindu to Islam come to notice, but the long-ingrained mutual hatred and distrust still exists. Hindus cannot forget the tragedies faced by their ancestors while some Muslim still harbour their dislike towards non-Muslims
Answer:
1. Each state had only one vote regardless of size
2. Congress did not have the power to tax
3. Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce
4. There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress
Explanation:
I'm trying to go fast so you can get your homework done, If you want id love a brainliest!