Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Both A and C are almost required to communicate a complex idea. A. pulls the person into actually listening and C makes your idea comprehensible. If I had to go with one or the other, I would emphasize A since it makes certain that the person pays attention. However, putting into consideration that your teacher would likely not want that answer, I would instead go with C.
Answer:
Annual Financial advantage $ 550
Explanation:
<u>Computation of income/loss on special order</u>
Unit product costs
Normal product costs $ 19.20
Incremental variable costs $ 1.30 per unit <u>$ 1.30</u>
Total product costs $ 20.50
Revenues per unit <u>$ 26.00</u>
Profit per unit $ 5.50
Sales Units 2,100 units
Total incremental profit on order $ 11,550
Less; cost of moulds <u>$ 11,000</u>
Incremental profit on S 47 order $ 550
Answer:
The last option is the answer -$141.80
Explanation:
we will use the present value formula for Trish she gets paid every first day of the month therefore she will receive an immediate payment of cash flow which will be added to the present value of future periodic value. Therefore we will find the difference between present values for Trish and Josh which have the same amounts which they'll receive per month.
Given: Trish and josh both receive $450 per month therefore that will be C the monthly future payment that will be received.
They will receive these amounts in a course period of Four years so that will be n = 4 x12=48 because we know that they will receive these payments every month or on a monthly basis for four years. which n represent periodic payments.
i which is the discount rate of 9.5%/12 as we know they will recieve these amounts monthly.
Therefore using the following formulas for present value annuity:
Pv = C[(1-(1+i)^-n)/i] and Pv= C[(1-(1+i)^-n)/i](1+i) then get the difference between these two present values for Trish and Josh.
therefore we will substitute the above values on the above mentioned formula to get the difference:
Pv= 450[(1-(1+9.5%/12)^-48)/(9.5%/12)] - 450[(1-(1+9.5%/12)^-48)/(9.5%/12)](1+9.5%/12) then we compute and get
Pv= $17911.77614 - $18053.5777
Pv = -$141.80 is the difference between the two sets of present values as one has an immediate payment and one doesn't have it.
Answer:
$735,000
Explanation:
The fair values of the assets may be used as a basis for determining the amount to be recorded for each of the assets.
This will be in a proportional manner such that the higher the fair value, the higher the actual cost assigned and vice versa to the asset.
Hence the amount to be recorded for the building
= 840,000 / (840,000 + 840,000 + 1,120,000) * $2,450,000
= $735,000
