<span>In The Censors, Juans actions and motivations change from 3. selfless to self-absorbed.
Although he used to be very generous and always think about others first, over the course of the story he becomes selfish and puts himself first.
</span>
Answer:
The error is in the use of "was" before the subjects "pollution and disease".
The incorrect verb is "was".
The correct sentence will be <em>"pollution and disease were to blame for the decimation of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population in the 1990s"</em>.
Explanation:
When we say the subject-verb agreement, then it means that the helping verb used is dependent on the number of the subject(s). This means that if the subject is singular, then the verb will be singular, and if it is plural, then the verb also becomes plural.
Now, taking the given sentence, we can see that the subjects are <em>"pollution and disease"</em>, which is plural in nature. The use of "and" makes it plural, thereby making the use of the singular verb "was" wrong.
Thus, the correct sentence will be <u><em>"pollution and disease were to blame for the decimation of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population in the 1990s".</em></u>
Answer:
All of the above.
Explanation:
Charlotte Bronte's classic "Jane Eyre" revolves around the story of a young girl named Jane Eyre, an orphan who suffered a lot during her childhood but became independent and found love and happiness in the end. The whole story deals with the theme of love, suffering, life's struggles, and the eventual happiness that comes.
The opening chapters of the novel present a young Jane living with her Aunt Reed and her children who treated her nothing more than a servant (<em>"you are less than a servant, for you do nothing for your keep"</em>) or a hindrance. She was asked to address her cousin John Reed as <em>"Master Reed</em>", was punished for whatever claims they can find and get, and locked up whenever she showed any form of resistance. She also stated <em>"I was a discord in Gateshead Hall: I was like nobody there"</em>, showing how unpleasant it was for her to be there and live under their care.
I do not understand the question.
Nicely, it relies upon. while you're speaking with regard to the historic past of a particular united states, subculture, or region, the dividing line could be a particular adventure that got here approximately in the time of that century. while you're speaking approximately England, as an occasion, "as much as the early seventeenth century" could desire to comprise in simple terms the 1st few years of the century, till 1603, while Queen Elizabeth died. or you may desire to assert that each thing up till the outbreak of the English Civil conflict in 1642 grew to become into "early seventeenth century." in spite of while you're in fact speaking approximately England (or the different particular united states/subculture) it easily relies upon on what you're speaking approximately -- what's a logical or functional slicing-off component to your subject remember.<span>
</span>
