Gladden describes Reformers as the "Men of Goodwill".
Washington Gladden was a prominent leader and a person who formulated the idea of the Social Gospel (a movement in North America began in the second half of the 19th century), he was also a preeminent member of the Progressive Movement. He had a firm belief in the social gospel. He urged his followers (reformers) to <u>put pressure on the political leaders to follow the will of the common people, rather the desires of affluent Industrialists</u>. One of the most significant contributions of the reformers to the society was the making of the Settlement Houses. He and his followers raised voice for the equality of the African- Americans.
The pros were that you were being protected by the guild in case of something bad happening you like getting hurt or similar. They would help you and your family for example. The cons were that you wouldn't be able to dictate the price of your wares which was done to prevent exploitation of consumers, so even if you were in a position to establish a personal monopoly, you couldn't and you couldn't become richer than what is the adequate wealth for a merchant.
The imperialism prevails because it shaped not by distributing or transporting enormous numbers of refugees to settle and inhabit new lands, but instead by generating and producing political, military, and business structures that permitted them to govern and profit from existing inhabitants. This enhances imperial nations and formed new classes or types of people whose lives were molded by demands of imperial administration and business.
Answer: The election was a political realignment that ushered in a generation of Democratic-Republican leadership.
Explanation: In what is sometimes referred to as the "Revolution of 1800", Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party defeated incumbent President John Adams of the Federalist Party so b*** pay attention in school
The best use of the excerpt in question by historians would be to understand <u>A. The</u><u> political debates</u><u> over </u><u>economic development. </u>
The excerpt focuses on Henry Clay and his argument for the Tariff of 1833 which would replace the Tariff of 1832 which had been controversial because:
- It essentially forced Southern States to buy goods at a higher rate from Northern manufacturers
- It led to Britain buying less goods from the South
The excerpt therefore showed how politicians debated over economic subjects such as tariffs and protectionism.
We can therefore conclude that historians could use it to better understand the political nature of debates over economic development at the time.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/5248524. </em>
