Answer:
An educated guess or a presumption based on review of the research literature
Explanation:
A hypothesis is an educated guess or a presumption based on review of the research literature.
It is a proposition based on reasoning without any assumption of its truth, it enables the researcher to have a better understanding about the subject matter of the study.
Explanation:
The poverty line is the smallest amount of money, a person or a family needs to live on; to buy what is needed and is a line which is a gulf between the rich and the poor.
The Census Bureau determines poverty status by using an official poverty measure (OPM) that compares pre - tax cash income against a threshold that is set at three times the cost of a minimum food diet in 1963 and adjusted for family size.
I believe the answer is: B. <span>It denies enforceability to certain contracts that are not in writing
Statute of frauds stated that to be legally binding, an agreement should be materialized in a contract that filled with a specific obligation that must be met by each party under the circumstances that they both agreed on. If this writing do not exist, technically we wouldn't have any ground to sue if the other party failed to fulfill the obligation.</span>
The correct answer is letter B.
Explanation: Philosophy is not a set of ready-made knowledge, a finished system, closed in on itself. Philosophy is a way of thinking and it is also a stance towards the world.
Therefore, philosophical questions cannot be taken as correct or incorrect, all reflections are part of the maturation of the idea, including criticism, whether positive or negative.
Prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, The Bill of Rights ( the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution) only applied to the Federal government. This meant that states were not obliged to adopt the Amendments and the laws that came as a result of them.
After the Civil War ended, the Fourteenth Amendment was created and ratified, the Bill of Rights was now applicable not only to federal courts but also to state ones. This meant that citizens were now more protected, as federal and states obligations are the same in most cases.
