Telemetry
Tele- Distance
Metry/o- To measure
Answer:
shows
Explanation:
Simple Present tense... Television ad running everyday
1. narwhal what Aronnax thinks the monster may be (a sea unicorn)
2. Abraham Lincoln United States' government boat
3. static character does not change
4. scientist Aronnax
5. shaped like a cylinder Nautilus
6. denouement name of the resolving action after the climax
7. 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea science fiction
The line "Blood drizzling on the Capitol" is symbolic.
<h3>What does this passage symbolize?</h3>
- Deaths.
- Violence.
- Brutality.
- Suffering.
In the literature, the use of symbols is very common, as authors use them to represent larger and broader concepts that would be tedious to explain literally in the text. In this case, the authors seek simple and more subjective terms to represent these concepts to the reader in a more attractive way.
In the text indicated in the question above, the sentence "Blood drizzling on the Capitol" is used to symbolize a scenario of barbarism, extreme violence, and very aggressive killings.
Learn more about literary symbols:
brainly.com/question/13291061
#SPJ1
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
