Answer:
<h3>
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em></h3>
Explanation:
<em>s</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>,</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em>
Answer:
The answer is (B) transfer dollars, and therefore purchasing power, into the future.
Explanation:
A store of value is best described as a function contained in an asset that allows it to be saved, retrieved, and traded in the future. Money provides this function, alongside other forms of assets such as bonds, gemstones, and precious metals. Other functions of money, include as a medium of exchange and a unit of account.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
c. $7,500 ordinary gain
Explanation:
Depreciated value of Machine = $55,000 - $12,500
= $ 42,500
Sale price of Machine = $ 50,000
Gain on sale of Asset = $ 50,000 - $ 42,500
= $ 7,500
Therefore, The amount and character of Butte's gain or loss is $7,500 ordinary gain.