If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1
<span>This is a true statement. When Joseph is setting these plans, he is giving himself a roadmap on how he and his employees will best achieve these goals over the timeframe required. By planning, he can make sure that the business stays on track to meet whatever figures the company has set forth.</span>
Answer:
inventory
Explanation:
Every item that is produced or purchased by the business in order to resell it and earn profit through it as a normal purpose of business, is considered as inventory.
In the given instance, Shroden manufactures consumer goods, like cookies, batteries, etc:
And since he targets to sell them and earn profit, all these manufactured products is the inventory of his business.
Answer:
Janine is an accountant who makes $30,000 a year. Robert is a college student who makes$8,000 a year. All other things equal, who is more likely to stand in a long line to get a cheap concert ticket?
Robert; his opportunity cost is lower
Explanation:
Robert has loss of potential gain from the alternative available, his low income will made him to queue in order to get the concert ticket
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Both Laura and Cassie are correct.
Explanation:
Since Laura says that the present value of $ 700 to be received one year from today if the interest rate is 6 percent is less than the present value of $ 700 to be received two years from today if the interest rate is 3 percent, and Cassie says that $ 700 saved for one year at 6 percent interest has a smaller future value than $ 700 saved for two years at 3 percent interest, to determine who is right, the following calculations must be performed:
700 x 1.06 = 742
700 x 1.03 ^ 2 = 742.63
Therefore, both Laura and Cassie are correct in their claims.
