Term stereotype comes from the French adjective stéréotype and derives from the Greek words στερεός (stereos), "firm, stable" and τύπος (typos), impression, consequently "strong impact on one or extra ideas/theories.
Stereotype chance ends in a vicious circle. Stigmatized individuals enjoy tension which depletes their cognitive assets and results in underperformance, affirmation of the poor stereotype, and reinforcement of the worry.
Stereotypes highlight differences between agencies and are in particular misguided (such as not likely, intense sorts) while agencies are comparable. Stereotypical wondering implies overreaction to statistics that generate or confirms a stereotype, and underreaction to statistics that contradicts it.
Learn more about Stereotype here:brainly.com/question/361502
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think it's B. because it shows that the president doesn't do all of the work. but it could be A, because checks and balances practically means the same thing
Answer:
Committee Hearing
Explanation:
Through committee hearings committee members inform congress about information gathered on business the committee is tasked with. These could be legislative, investigative, oversight businesses.
Issues such as customer safety, Healthcare, Crime and foreign trade are investigative businesses.
Answer:
Taught them to tame their horses, which were an important part in their culture.
Taught them to use numbers and how to count.
She taught them victory without the bloodshed.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
