All categories

2 years ago

Question 1

Mathematics

1 answer:

Vlada [557]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The point-slope form is y - 8 = 4(x - 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

slope = 4
passes through (2, 8)

the point-slope form is y - y1 = m(x - x1)

(x1, y1) is a known point
m is the slope of the line
(x, y) is any other point on the line

Hence the point-slope form is y - 8 = 4(x - 2)

Learn more about Point-Slope Form here: brainly.com/question/18617367

You might be interested in

Twenty-seven is % of 60 help mee asap

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer: The answer is: " 45 % " .

________________________________________________

→ " Twenty-seven is 45 % of 60. "

________________________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

________________________________________________

The question asks:

" 27 is what % {percentage] of 60 " ? ;

________________________

So: " 27 = (n/100) * 60 " ; Solve for "n" ;

________________________________________________

Method 1:

________________________________________________

→ (n/100) * 60 = 27 ;

Divide each side by 60 :

→ [ (n/100) * 60 ] / 60 = 27 /60 ;

to get:

→ (n/100) = 27/60 ;

Now: Cross-factor multiply:

→ 60n = (27)*(100) ;

to get:

→ 60n = 2700 ;

Divide each side by "60" ;

→ 60n = 2700/ 60 ;

to get: n = 45 ;

________________________

→ The answer is: 45 % .

→ " Twenty-seven is 45 % of 60."

________________________________________________

Method 2:

________________________________________________

The question asks:

" 27 is what % {percentage] of 60 " ?

________________________

To solve this problem:

Rephrase this question as:

________________________

" 27 is 60% of what number ? "

→ The answer will be the same!

________________________

→ 27 = (60/100)* n ; Solve for "n" ;

Multiply each side of the equation by "100" ; to eliminate the fraction:

→ 100 * 27 = 100 * [ (60/100)* n ] ;

to get:

→ 2700 = 60n ;

↔ 60n = 2700 ;

Divide Each Side of the equation by "60" ;

→ 60n/60 = 2700 / 60 ;

to get: n = 45 ;

________________________________________________

→ The answer is: 45 % .

→ " Twenty-seven is 45 % of 60."

________________________________________________

Method 2: Variant 1 of 2:

________________________________________________

When we have:

→ 27 = (60/100)* n ; Solve for "n" ;

________________________

Note that: "(60/100) = (60÷ 100) = (6 ÷ 10)" ; since: in "(60/100)" ; the "zero" from the "numerator" cancels out; And: the "last zero" in "100" — from the "denominator" cancels out; since we are dividing "each side" of the fraction by "10" ;

→ "(60÷10) / (600÷10)" = " 6/10 " ;

→ " (6/10)" ; that is; "six-tenths"} ;

→ can be represented by: " 0.6 " ;

→ {by convention; but specifically, here is the explanation} — as follows:

________________________

→ "(6/10)" = " (6 ÷ 10) " ;

Note: When dividing a number by "10" ; we take the original number; and move the decimal point to the left; & then we rewrite that number as the "answer".

Note: When multiplying or dividing by a positive, non-zero integer factor of "10" that has at least 1 (one) "zero" after that particular factor of "10". We can get the answer by taking the original number & moving the decimal point the number of spaces as designated by the number of zeros following the particular [aforementioned factor of "10".].

We move the decimal point to the right if we are multiplying; and to the left if we are dividing. In this case, we are dividing "6" by "10 " :

→ " 6 ÷ 10 = ? " ;

→ " 6. ÷ 10 = ? " ;

We take the: " 6. " ; and move the decimal point "one space backward [i.e. "to the left"]; since we are dividing by "10" ;

→ to get: " .6 " ; & we rewrite this value as "0.6" in a rewritten equation:

________________________

So; we take our equation:

→ 27 = (60/100)*n ; And rewrite—substituting "0.6" for

"(60/100)"— as follows:

________________________

→ 27 = (0.6)n ; ↔ (0.6) n = 27 ;

Multiply each side of the equation by "10" ; to eliminate the decimal:

→ 10 * [ (0.6)n ] = 27 * 10 ;

to get:

→ 6n = 270 ;

Divide each side of the equation by "6" ; to isolate "n" on one side of the equation; & to solve for "n" ;

→ 6n / 6 = 270 / 6 ;

to get: n = 45 ;

________________________________________________

→ The answer is: 45 % .

→ " Twenty-seven is 45 % of 60."

________________________________________________

Method 2 (variant 2 of 2):

________________________________________________

We have the equation: 27 = (60/100)* n ; Solve for "n" ;

________________________

Note: From Method 2 (variant) 1 of 2— see above):

________________________

Note: Refer to the point at which we have:

________________________

→ " { (60÷10) / (600÷10)" = " (6/10) " ; that is; "six-tenths"} ;

________________________

Note that the fraction— "(6/10)" ; can be further simplified:

→ "(6/10)" = "(6÷2) / (10÷2)" = "(3/5)" ;

Now, we can rewrite the equation;

→ We replace "(60/100)" ; with: "(3/5)" :

→ 27 = (3/5)* n ; Solve for "n" ;

↔ (3/5)* n = 27 ;

↔ (3n/5) = 27 ;

Multiply Each Side of the equation by "5" ;

→ 5* (3n/5) = 27 * 5 ;

to get:

→ 3n = 135 ;

Divide Each side of the equation by "3" ; to isolate "n" on one side of the equation; & to solve for "n" ;

→ 3n / 3 = 135 / 3 ;

to get: n = 45 ;

________________________________________________

→ The answer is: 45 % .

→ " Twenty-seven is 45 % of 60."

________________________________________________

Hope this answer is helpful!

Wishing you the best in your academic endeavors

— and within the "Brainly" community!

________________________________________________

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is bigger 3/4 or 2/3

tia_tia [17]

When we make it into a common denominator, find a common multiple between the denominators. For this instance, it is 3/4=9/12 2/3=8/12 When we see it with a common denominator, 3/4 is bigger than 2/3.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve the system. x + y - z = 17 y +z = 1 z = -3

Anna35 [415]

Answer:

(10, 4, -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

z = -3

y + z = 1

y - 3 = 1

y = 4

x + y - z = 17

x + 4 - -3 = 17

x + 4 + 3 = 17

x + 7 = 17

x = 10

(10, 4, -3)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Prove the following DeMorgan's laws: if LaTeX: XX, LaTeX: AA and LaTeX: BB are sets and LaTeX: \{A_i: i\in I\} {Ai:i∈I} is a fam

MariettaO [177]

$X-(A\cup B)=(X-A)\cap(X-B)$

I'll assume the usual definition of set difference, $X-A=\{x\in X,x\not\in A\}$ .

Let $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ . If $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , then $x\not\in A$ and $x\not\in B$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ , so it follows that $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Hence $X-(A\cup B)\subset(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ .

Now let $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Then $x\in X-A$ and $x\in X-B$ . By definition of set difference, $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ . Since $x\not A,x\not\in B$ , we have $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , and so $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Hence $(X-A)\cap(X-B)\subset X-(A\cup B)$ .

The two sets are subsets of one another, so they must be equal.

$X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)=\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$

The proof of this is the same as above, you just have to indicate that membership, of lack thereof, holds for all indices $i\in I$ .

Proof of one direction for example:

Let $x\in X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i$ , which in turn means $x\not\in A_i$ for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_2}$ , and so on, where $\{i_1,i_2,\ldots\}\subset I$ , for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X-A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X-A_{i_2}$ , and so on, so $x\in\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ . Hence $X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)\subset\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ .

4 0

3 years ago

Simplify the expression: –3(3 + 2n)

noname [10]

Answer:

-9 - 6n is the answer

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers