Answer:
I'm thinking the last answer, but it could be the first answer.
Explanation:
<span>John Kotter built on Lewin's three-step model to create a more detailed approach for implementing change. </span>
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
your answer is III. It usually involves the participation of a large number of people united for a common goal. this is because it is the closest definition to what a social movement is.
Answer:
increasing violence in college football
Explanation: