Answer:
employees[0].firstName
Explanation:
The syntax would be employees[0].firstName so that employees get registered by their first name. the [0] would be the employer number (0-50) and first name wouls store each employer's first name.
The best word to replace the “issues” is anxieties. The reasons
why she would not just leave the town and escape the situation is due to some
reasons which makes her look anxious on some matters. First, she was morally
obligated to repay for all the wrong acts she had done in the town where she
committed them. For her, it’s but right to serve her punishment on the scene of
her guilt. Second, running away would only strengthen the people’s judgment of
her on being guilty. Another is, she actually had nowhere to go to when she
will decided to just run away. To add to that, these may be good reasons but
half of the truth was, she’d also want to stay because of her fondness to stay
close to her lover, Dimmesdale.
The correct answers are: both; one.
Answer 1: <span>Women tend to use both their left and right brain hemispheres when performing verbal and spatial tasks. An explanation for this is possibly that women have a larger corpus callosum than men do. The corpus callosum refers to the bundle of nerves that connects the left brain hemisphere to the right </span>brain hemisphere and transmits messages between both brain hemispheres.
Answer 2: M<span>en are more likely to use one hemisphere </span>when performing verbal and spatial tasks. Research indicates that men's brain functioning shows more asymmetry in functioning wherein one brain hemisphere (usually the left) shows more activity when performing tasks of different natures. This is likely because men have a smaller corpus callosum and less transmission of messages between both brain hemispheres.
I would choose between A and C because those make much more sense than the other problems.
Answer: C
Explanation:In economics, a backward-bending supply curve of labour, or backward-bending labour supply curve, is a graphical device showing a situation in which as real (inflation-corrected) wages increase beyond a certain level, people will substitute leisure (non-paid time) for paid worktime and so higher wages lead to a decrease in the labour supply and so less labour-time being offered for sale.[1]
The "labour-leisure" tradeoff is the tradeoff faced by wage-earning human beings between the amount of time spent engaged in wage-paying work (assumed to be unpleasant) and satisfaction-generating unpaid time, which allows participation in "leisure" activities and the use of time to do necessary self-maintenance, such as sleep. The key to the tradeoff is a comparison between the wage received from each hour of working and the amount of satisfaction generated by the use of unpaid time.
Such a comparison generally means that a higher wage entices people to spend more time working for pay; the substitution effect implies a positively sloped labour supply curve. However, the backward-bending labour supply curve occurs when an even higher wage actually entices people to work less and consume more leisure or unpaid time.
