Answer:
Option D All of the above statements are correct.
Explanation:
The solution of the issue is software integration and making flow of information on timely basis across the company. The recommended solutions given in the question are correct because:
- Establishing a lockbox arrangement is similar to having a single company bank account. This means that the company will have a confirmation from the bank that the payment is received by the bank from customers.
- The remittance advice sent with payment helps to solve the misunderstanding, assist in recording transaction to keep the system updated and provides resistance to fraudulent practice.
- The mailroom personnel who require mailing of trade receivable balance which the customers owe to company and trade payable balance which the company owes to suppliers. This avoids the company paying illegitimate amounts and receiving the amounts which the customers actually should pay to the company.
So all of the statements are correct.
Answer: Not necessarily: The debt ratios are not directly comparable, since each company is in a different industry.
Explanation:
We cannot authoritatively state that even though Boeing has such a high debt rate, that it is a riskier company than either Microsoft or PG&E. This is due to the drawback in ratio analysis of bias if compared across different industries.
Ratio analysis best works when comparing companies in the same industry because their situations will be similar. Comparing across industries can be misleading because different industries operate in different ways. In the Airplane manufacturing business for instance, having a high amount of debt due to having the tangible assets to back it up might be a normal thing.
The debt ratios are therefore not directly comparable because each company is in a different industry.
Answer:
D. an incidental beneficiary.
Explanation:
These are the options for the question
A. an intended beneficiary.
B. a promisee.
C. a promisor.
D. an incidental beneficiary.
From the question we are informed about Apps LLC who enters into a contract with Birk, the chief executive officer of Corporate Sales Inc., to create an app for the firm. To fulfill the contract, Apps hires Dave as a student intern. In this case With respect to the app contract, Dave is an incidental beneficiary. A contract can be regarded as an agreement that exist between two parties and It is legally back up. An incidental beneficiary from this contract can be regarded as the third party that just get some benefits from a contract that exist between two other parties in an agreement, even though the benefits the third part gets is not intended to get it, and there is no legal right for the third party as far as the contract is concerned.
Answer:
$31,000
Explanation:
Given:
Janie holds joint account with her mother that has a balance of $562,000. They are covered up to $250,000 each under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
It is assumed by FDIC that all co-owners' shares are equal.
So, Janie's share in the balance = 562,000 ÷ 2
= $281,000
Amount insured = $250,000
Uninsured amount = 281,000 - 250,000
= $31,000
Therefore, Janie's savings worth $31,000 will not be covered by deposit insurance.
Answer:
The correct option is (B)
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold the cost attributed to goods produced by the organization. Cost of goods sold is incurred by organizations that manufactures a tangible product. Service firms do not incur any cost on goods sold as they do not need any raw material to manufacture goods.
Cost of goods sold is an expense and not an asset as it is a cost incurred to manufacture assets for the organization.
Therefore, correct option is (B)
