This is a very complex question and the answer truly depends on the person answering the question. In my opinion, the threat of war does not justify unlimited limits on civil liberties. In cases of threat of war, some countries will take extreme actions like limiting their people's access to the news or internet. This is an extreme measure of taking away certain civil liberties. However they may be situations where a government may prevent their people from visiting a country that has made a proven threat of danger to its people or country. To me this is not a violation of civil liberties, it is the government working to clearly protect their people from direct harm.
Eric (the red) sailed west from the Pennisula, he came across Gunnbjorn island then ended up of the coast of east greenland. then sailed south and ended up in southern greenland
According to the information given below, I've come to the conclusion that in this scenario, Fresnas Inc. has adopted a production orientation.
he gives credit to his mother, this is because when he and his sister Marnie were young, she would chant rhymes to them to soothe them to sleep.
Answer: he made a new building called deminstation nationz that was where kids could go to learn
Explanation: