1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andru [333]
3 years ago
8

What ONE characteristic of a government is most important in determining if it is an autocracy or democracy?

Social Studies
1 answer:
padilas [110]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Autocracy is a system of government in which supreme power over a state is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of coup d'état or other forms of rebellion).

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jon recently stopped a conflict with his girlfriend, Ana, and said to her, "You don't know how to have a disagreement without lo
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

A. Meta-conflict

Explanation:

Meta-conflict is about whether or how to engage in conflict. In case of conflict between Jon and Ana, they further tend to engage in conflict rather than ease it off. "You don't know" is the negation of Ana who does not disagree without losing her temper. Ana, on the other hand, is ready to "confront the issue" which means she is prepared to escalate the conflict. Ana does not believe in avoiding issue, the first lesson in easing conflict. Jon accuses Ana and Ana is ready to confront.

4 0
3 years ago
The principle of limited government prevents a leader from:
Mandarinka [93]
Your answer should be B
8 0
3 years ago
The average number of years a person is expected to live is known as
Amanda [17]

Answer:

the answer is C

Explanation:

its the expectant amount of time a person is to live

8 0
4 years ago
What would a society be like if there were no rules enacted by a body like the legislature?​
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Without any rules and regulation in society there would most likely be anarchy and even greater corruption by the few.

It would be total anarchy.

At first it would be fine. People would get along fine. But then someone gets drunk and kills someone else. Then a third person kills the second person.

Finally, a fourth person would try to stop the fight peacefully, he would die, and then everyone would get angry at the person who killed the fourth guy (I know, it’s confusing, but stay with me), and they would kill him.

People would then realise, after the fact no one got in trouble, that they could do whatever they wanted. Large companies wouldn't Have to abide by any laws, so monopolies would occur.

Because there is no government, there would be no official currency. This means coins would be counterfeited and the economy would crash.

There would be environmental damage as well. Without any laws about game, critically endangered animals would die out, causing the ecosystem to fall apart. Overfishing would kill of entire species of fish.

Finally, only small villages would remain, as cities would be to dangerous because of all the pillaging. Seaside towns would die out as overfishing would destroy their food source. small villages would have their own governments and would survive for a couple more decades until bandits came and looted everyone.

By this point, nuclear power plants will of melted, causing extreme damage to what's left of the ecosystem. Bandits would survive the longest, because they’re nomads they'd pillage until there truly was no food left, and then the human race would die.

Hope this helps and if you could mark me as brainliest. Thanks!

4 0
3 years ago
Traders, religious missionaries, and colonial authorities all sought to reshape Indian society and culture. Identify the stateme
Alina [70]

<u>Answer: </u>

The statements that describe recurrent warfare between colonists and Indians are:

A. Colonists frequently forced out Indians, and then settled on the land that they had cleared, and

B. The conflicts resulted in feelings of superiority from the colonists and further encouraged their creation of boundaries between the two cultures.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The conflicts between the colonists and Indians seemed eternal as the colonists were determined to expand their dominance and the Indians were determined to protect their interests and their territory.
  • With the help of technically advanced warfare techniques, the colonists succeeded in making the Indians flee out of their own territories and captured the lands originally spanned by various tribes of Indian people.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which theory of American democracy posits that group competition results in a rough approximation of the public interest in publ
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Americans settlers feel it was necessary to remove the American Indian? ​
    7·2 answers
  • A research study involving adults with schizophrenia looked at their facial expressions in home movies taken when they were chil
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best compare Martin Luther King, Jr. and Nelson Mandela?
    14·2 answers
  • What type of material was used to build Great Wall
    13·2 answers
  • PLease help with these questions!!
    9·1 answer
  • Which religion continues to dominate in Latin America today due to the influence of European imperialism ?
    14·1 answer
  • What is democracy why is democracy use
    10·2 answers
  • What impact did the Mayflower Compact have on our founding fathers idea of government
    12·1 answer
  • What is climatic change​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!