Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
Answer:
Impulse Buying
Explanation:
She isn't thinking about the long term effects of her purchase, like the repayments, but is instead thinking about her short term gain.
The answer is Japan. It is decreasing at a record pace. The country lost 244,000 people in 2013 as births jumped and deaths increased. It faces the vision
of losing a third of its population in the next 50 years, raising uncertainties
about its economic prospects and labor market.
Answer:
The monthly deposit is calculated using PMT function :
rate = 1.2%/2 (converting annual rate into monthly rate)
nper = 12 * 5 (5 years of deposits with 12 monthly deposits each year)
pv = -3200 (Amount put into account now. This is entered with a negative sign because it is a cash outflow)
fv = 26865 (Required value of account after 5 years)
PMT is calculated to be $379.70.
The monthly deposit is $379.70.
Answer:
(A) is the manner in which the burden of a tax is shared among participants in a market
Explanation:
Tax incidence refers to the burden of a tax between buyers or sellers or other stakeholders.
When price elasticity of supply is greater than price elasticity of demand, i.e a change in price causes supply to change more than demand, the tax incidence is said to be more burdensome for the buyers and vice versa.
It represents the distribution of tax burden to various sections of a society such as producers, consumers, etc.
For example, if taxes and duties are raised on alcohol or cigarettes, the producers shall transfer such burden on the consumers by covering their margin and raising prices. Thus, in such a case, the tax incidence would be borne by the consumers.
