Answer:
the expected return from the investment is higher than that of those investments whose standard deviation is greater than zero.
Explanation:
As for the coefficient of variation which clearly defines the difference in values from the mean value in the data set.
It clearly defines as standard deviation/mean.
Where standard deviation is 0 the coefficient will also be 0 which shall represent the risk associated with it.
The least the coefficient of variation the least the risk with maximum return.
Thus, the correct statement will be concluding that the expected return from this investment will be higher than the returns from the project in which standard deviation is more than 0.
Answer:
(C) debit to Foreign-Currency Transaction Loss-$1040
Explanation:
Foreign currency related Financial assets and financial liabilities are usually revalued with any difference as a result of the exchange rates posted as a gain or loss in the income statement.
On transaction date, cost of assets
= 520000 * $0.034
On payment date, the amount paid
= 520000 * $0.036
The amount paid is higher than the liability recorded before hence the difference is recognized as a loss on foreign exchange.
= 520000 * $0.036 - 520000 * $0.034
= $1040
Answer:
The transformational leaders are bureaucratic and charismatic are people oriented in nature.
Explanation:
- The charismatic leaders are also called as the transformational leaders and shares various things.
- Charismatic leaders make their status better and transformational leaders focus on the transformation of the organization's vision. The main difference is the focus and the audience.
- The charismatic leaders are committed and have engaging personalities like martin Luther king as his speeches were often more tangible than other leaders and used to have a huge influence on the people he met.
- The charismatic leaders are more emotionally attached to their audience. They work towards an emphasis on the greater good. More people-oriented.
These are examples of <u>work-related</u> characteristics
Answer:
Workplace discrimination prevents the firm from using the full potential of those employees that are being discriminated against.
Explanation:
For example, if the firm discriminates against a specific group of people when hiring (for example, it can discriminate against older people), the firm could lose valuable potential employees that could have provided great skill and experience for the firm.
If the firm practices discrimination against employees, the operation in the company will not be as streamlined as it could be against discrimination because those who are being treated poorly will be less motivated and have lesser output.
