According to the book, when information and viewpoints about a public health crisis are inconsistent, it is important to: a. Acknowledge and explain inconsistencies.
Reasonable and practical rules for public health crisis and public health risk factors can be solved by communication and will aid in through the infodemic, consistent, and comprehensive correspondence about the risks. Risk communication can help public authorities in acknowledging and forestalling ineffectual, havoc, and possibly harming public reactions to serious emergencies, like surprising sickness or disease and bioterrorism. Besides, suitable risk communication systems encourage the trust and certainty that are fundamental in an emergency circumstance.
Note: Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was
"According to the book, when information and viewpoints about a public health crisis inconsistent, it is important to:
a. Acknowledge and explain inconsistencies.
b. Silence sources that are likely to provide inconsistent information.
c. Focus on specific examples rather than on scientific information.
d. Limit information to what has been published in scientific journals."
Learn more about public health crisis here,
brainly.com/question/15723350
#SPJ4
