Answer:
B. Historical cost principle
Explanation:
In accounting, historical cost principle indicates that a business or an organization must record and account for both assets and liabilities at their purchase or buying price. In points that during bookkeeping, while recording the worth of an assets, the purchase price used in buying it must be recorded. Here, Lisa bought the building for $35000 but recorded $50000 because she believes that to be the real value. By doing so, lisa has violated the historical cost principle concept.
Answer:
<u>Transactions:</u>
1. June 1 Monthly invests $3, 910 cash in exchange for shares of common stock in a small welding business.
2. June 2 Purchases equipment on account for 340.
3. June 3 $760 cash is paid to landlord for June rent.
4. June 12 Bills P. Leonard $410 after completing welding work done on account.
<u>Journal Entries:</u>
1.
June 1 Dr. Cr.
Investment $3,910
Cash $3,910
2.
June 2 Dr. Cr.
Equipment $340
Account Payable $340
3.
June 3 Dr. Cr.
Rent Expense $3,760
Cash $3,760
4.
June 12 Dr. Cr.
P. Leonard (Receivable) $410
Welding Service Revenue $410
Answer: The correct answer is "a. the bulk of the public debt is owned by U.S. citizens and institutions.".
Explanation: To say that "the U.S. public debt is mostly held internally" is to say that:<u> the bulk of the public debt is owned by U.S. citizens and institutions.</u>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The quality should be about the same.
The social responsibility should also be about the same.
There shouldn't be side effects of most products. If you are speaking of medications, there really ought to be the same side effects with the same severity and the same statistical occurrences.
The only difference is the company selling the product.
There have been exceptions to this where different "fillers" were used in the generic brand and the side effects were different and more severe. I've only heard of one case however and I cannot remember what it was. Manufacturers were careful not to let it happen again.
Answer:
Discuss the concerns you have with the supervisor in charge.
Explanation:
It is wrong under the ethics code to ignore a clear sign that an intervention is required be it in business decision making or in this case, construction. It is your obligation to report any abnormality noticed to the supervisor in charge.
