Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
The correct answer is the demand withdraw pattern. This
occurs in one of two patterns between the marital partners by which the other
party is seeking change, resolution to an issue or likely to be called the
demander whereas the other party is seeking to an end or avoid discussion and
likely to be referred to be as the withdrawer.
970,000 sq mi) is your answer hope this helped :)
Answer:
The answer is B people may not see it in the same way when someone usually says something is creative people can interpret it in different ways like a poem kind of or like something abstract they see different things in it
Explanation:
Answer:
el profesionista debe conducirse con justicia, honradez, honestidad, diligencia, lealtad, respeto , formalidad, discreción, honorabilidad, ... sinceridad, provida, dignidad, buena fe y en estricta observancia a las normas legales y éticas de su profesión. el enunciado se refiere a una disposición o norma ética ...
Explanation:
MORE POWER
