No the answer is B- Neither. Its an incomplete sentence so it would be dependent clause but thats not any option which leads it to be B - Neither.
1. The main idea would be "<span>Scientists have lots of evidence to explain why dragons don't exist."
Emphasized by the evidence and word choice related to scientific evidence
2. The main idea would be "</span><span>I have always wondered if dragons existed, and I hope they did."
Displayed through the author's nature of questioning and evaluating different kinds of evidence and ideas. </span>
"It give me wonder greate as my content to see you here before me. O my soul's joy! if after every tempest come such calms..." -foreshadowing
They would have more leisure time to teems and They would have machines labouring for their is most affect the anin.
<h3>What is the
explanation of the expert?</h3>
Using an object, an idea, or a person as the symbol allows the author to give the text a greater meaning.
By providing electricity to the farm, the "windmill" would assist "operate a dynamo," "light the stalls and warm them in winter," "run a circular saw, a chaff-cutter, a mangel-slicer, and an electric milking machine," all of which would help industrialization in the economy.
Thus, option C and E are correct.
For more details about explanation of the expert, click here:
brainly.com/question/17364159
#SPJ1
