Answer:
B) Bev could intervene and disallow the apportionment since only exclusive easements in gross can be apportioned.
Explanation:
There are two types of easements:
- easements in gross (exclusive easements) give legal right to use another person's land as long as the holder the easement lives or the title of the land is passed to another owner. This type of easement can be partially transferred.
- appurtenant easements (non-exclusive easements) gives legal right to use adjourning property, this right is transferred when the land is sold. This type of easement cannot be divided or partially transferred.
Tax progressivity refer to a system in which individuals earn more pay higher taxes.
United States taxation system is considered tax progressive, individuals who earned up to $ 8,375 fell to the 10% tax bracket, meanwhile those who earn more than $ 373,650 fall to the 35 % tax bracket
Answer:$500
Explanation:
Sell short means ,borrowing shares of a company that the buyer speculates will fall in value at a later date
Change in equity 100(28-23)=100×5=$500
Hello there!
Let's take note of some things first. When a argument occurs, there's always two different kind of people. You would have someone who think he has a point and he explains his opinion on this matter, and then you would have the other opponent who would most likely say the complete opposite of this other person.
Now, when conduction the argument of the topic "cell phones", there would be a ton of different opinions on this matter.
For an example:
(Person #1) - opposer.
Cell Phone's are very useful, when you need to call a person, you would have something to communicate with the other person. It would be encounter as a essential in our every day life.
(Person #2) - opposer.
I believe that Cell Phones are unsafe. People could track you down and hurt you to the full. They can take your information, and then you would have some several bad cases on this matter. I believe that Cell Phones are not safe.
__________
Based on looking at this example here, you would see on how they're are two different opinions here. They both have different explanations.
I hope this helps you!
Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
From the comprehension given, the following is the most suitable description using principles of economics, "When markets do not achieve efficiency, government intervention can improve overall welfare."
At times it is possible to minimize externalities with government intervention, such as in this particular case government intervention could prevent the extinction of a specific type of fish, which will further lead to lead to an improvement in overall welfare.
