The two choices they had were either be subjectified to americanization , or give up their land and either relocate or be killed.
Class stratification is a form of social stratification in which a society is separated into parties whose members have different access to resources and power. An economic, natural, cultural, religious, interests and ideal rift usually exists between different classes.
The internet allows users to share opinions and recommendations in the type of forum is "Consumption Communities."
<h3>What is Consumption Communities?</h3>
A consumption community is a group of consumers who are interested in the same consumption activity and/or ideology.
The community can be organized by the consumers themself, by a company or a brand, or by a third party with an interest.
Some key features regarding the Consumption Communities are-
- Previous research on consumption communities, on the other hand, suggests that managing those is difficult, if not inconceivable, because societies are self-directed and comprise equal, autonomous actors.
- The idea of consumption community, initially proposed by historian Daniel Boorstin, asserts that in today's high-mobility society, people look not only to their neighborhood for feelings of community, but also to the communality of their consumption behavior (like; drinking same brand of beer).
- The concept was tested across borders by administering a newly developed psychological sense of community (PSC) scale to adults in Belgium and the United States. The findings back up the Boorstin hypothesis.
To know more about the Consumers, here
brainly.com/question/3227054
#SPJ4
They hunted large animals (that are now extinct) such as mammoths and mastodons, Good luck!
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
