1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inna [77]
3 years ago
10

A bylaw of Betma Corporation provides that no shareholder can sell his shares unless he first offers them for sale to the corpor

ation or its directors. The bylaw also states that this restriction shall be printed or stamped upon each stock certificate and shall bind all present or future owners or holders. Betma Corporation did not comply with this latter provision. Shaw, having knowledge of the bylaw restriction, nevertheless purchased twenty shares of the corporation’s stock from Rice, without having Rice first offer them for sale to the corporation or its directors. When Betma Corporation refused to effectuate a transfer of the shares to her, Shaw sued to compel a transfer and the issuance of a new certificate to her. What is the result? Explain.
Law
1 answer:
siniylev [52]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Betma Corporation will win the lawsuit

Explanation:

Betma Corporation has established that no shareholder may sell its shares unless it offers them for sale to the corporation or its directors, and has established that this restriction must be printed or stamped on each share certificate and this will be binding on all current or future owners or holders. Betma has established and complied with all these guidelines, and for this reason everyone is expected to comply as well.

However, Shaw did not abide by the guidelines set by Betma Corporation and bought shares that infringed what was set by Betma. Because Shaw has violated a legal guideline, Shawn will lose her lawsuit against Betma Corporation.

You might be interested in
How would our world be different without judicial review?​
Sav [38]
Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of local, state, or national government are invalid if they conflict with the Constitution. It also gives courts the power to declare an action of the executive or legislative branch to be unconstitutional.
4 0
3 years ago
In the context of dual regulation of subject matters, state law must fall under the supremacy clause and the commerce clause whe
Ede4ka [16]

In the context of dual regulation of subject matters, state law must fall under the supremacy clause and the commerce clause when

  • The subject matter is unconstitutional

<h3>What is Supremacy?</h3>

This means that one thing or one arm of government takes precedence over certain matters regarding the state based on the powers given to them by the Constitution.

With this in mind, we can see that with dual regulation where the subject matter is regulated by both the state and federal governments, the state law must fall under the Supremacy Clause and the Commerce Clause when the subject matter is unconstitutional.

Read more about dual regulation here:

brainly.com/question/874614

6 0
3 years ago
11)
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

hakdogggggggggg

Explanation:

nbvdiinvnanajja

8 0
3 years ago
​Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If
Fynjy0 [20]

Options are:

A.  establish, as a matter of principle, that QuikBilt acted wrongfully.

B.   Pure with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.

C.   Pure with funds for its loss of the bargain.

D.   Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts

Answer:

D.   Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts

Explanation:

Punitive Damages, often used in a law of tort, when the jury considered the acts of the tortfeasor or defendant to be either intentional, malicious, fraudulent, or violent in nature, and it is designed to do the following:

1. punish a defendant or tortfeasor and

2. discourage further such acts by the defendant or tortfeasor and others.

Therefore, in this case, if QuikBilt fails to meet the agreed standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts. Because such acts is deemed malicious, fraudulent and intentional.

4 0
3 years ago
Which is not a role of the Speaker of the House?
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

Its the 2nd one.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose you walk into the Capitol in Washington and ask to interview the most prominent person in the entire Congress if they ac
    13·1 answer
  • If you find yourself boxed in by a vehicle on your left out right, ____ to clear space beside you
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a presentation of the information through a layout or summary of a writing project?
    7·1 answer
  • Crime sketches provide _ not present in photographs , video , evidence , ect.
    9·1 answer
  • Children who are born in the US don't have to worry about their undocumented parents being deported because when an undocumented
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following offences is a form of larceny that involves the stealing of money and valuables from a victim without his
    14·1 answer
  • Nicki Minaj (50% full power) vs Scarlet Witch who wins
    9·1 answer
  • When is a territory called state ? ( i want to the long answer please ?)
    5·1 answer
  • The highway transportation system is made up of
    7·1 answer
  • rebekah, who is pregnant, works for an organization with more than 100 employees. she lives 20 miles away from work. by federal
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!