Question

Do you think it is right for judges and lawyers to use plea bargains and summary judgments to bypass juries? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Answer:

Yes i think this is right. Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials. Instead this gives a defendant a chance for a shorter sentence, especially if the defendant is not guilty. Agreeing to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.

Explanation:

None Needed

Answer 2

Answer:

Yes, because the agreement can be finalized, however, a judge needs to review and approve it. The prosecutor must present all of the terms of the deal to the judge, including conditions that must be satisfied in the future. The judge has the authority to accept or reject a plea bargain.

Explanation:

In addition, a guilty plea May haunt you for the rest of your life because it may result in a guilty finding that cannot be expunged from your record. In addition, if you're found guilty and placed on a period of Probation, and during that period of probation you violate, you could be facing substantial jail time.

Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant shows there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ... A motion for summary judgment should clearly identify each claim, defense, and/or party as to which summary judgment is sought.