Stop and Frisk laws and reasonable doubt
Well the numbers of crime that were reported were about 80% which was pretty high.
Answer:
The burden of proof is the obligation to present evidence on the subject of the lawsuit or the criminal charge
Explanation:
When an individual files a civil lawsuit against another individual, the burden of proof would rest on his or her shoulder. When the case gets official response and the trail process begins, each of the two parties involved would be asked to narrate their own side of the story. However, the party who brought the case to the court, known as the plaintiff, would be the one to prove that the things alleged in the lawsuits are only but true and that the other defendant caused the said harm or damages being talked about.
I think the Supreme Courts interpretations of free speech have become more libertarian over time. For example, free speech on LGBT matters would have been strictly prohibited a century ago.
