Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
9n - 2 = 5
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Answer:
1. Marcia
2. (I do not understand what this question is asking)
3. Marcia's estimation is closer
4. 690 people per year
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Marcia's estimation has a greater number of people because he estimated 600 people per year, while Adam estimated 2% of 12,500 (250 people per year).
2. (I do not understand what this question is asking)
3. marcias guess was 600 (600x50+12,500 = 42,500. 42,500 - 35,400 = 7,100) while Adam's guess was 250 per year (250x50+12,500 = 10,400). Therefore, Marcia's guess was closer to 35,400.
4. If Marcia adjusted her answer so that the population in Burbville was ACTUALLY going to be 34,500, she would need to adjust her estimation to 690 people per year.
Hope this helps! So sorry I couldn't understand question 2!
Answer:
56-7m
Step-by-step explanation:
l7m–56l m<8
so lets replace m with something smalller then 8, how about 7
so then it would be...
l 7 * 7 - 56 l=
l 49-56 l = l -7 l
but the absulute value of -7 is 7, so how does this help us? well lets see
56-49= 7 this proves that all we have to do is switch the order giving us the solution 56-7m
hope this helped :)
In order to know the equivalent expression of the given above, all we need to do is to simplify it. So, for the exponents, what we need to do is just subtract.
The final answer would be 3/2xy^3. So the answer is option C. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.
