The piece of evidence that best supports a written argument encouraging students to eat less candy is : ( C ) numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption
<h3>Effect of sugar on our health </h3>
The piece of evidence "numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption" will best discourage the consumption of candy as they contain a significant amount of sugar which will pose a threat our health. Every student want a healthy life therefore this evidence will encourage them to eat less candy.
Hence we can conclude that The piece of evidence that best supports a written argument encouraging students to eat less candy is : ( C ) numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption
Learn more about Candy consumption : brainly.com/question/24860176
#SPJ1
Answer:
Practice, practice, practice!
Explanation:
1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² + <em>i</em> ³ + <em>i</em> ⁴ + <em>i</em> ⁵ = 1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² (1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i </em>² + <em>i</em> ³)
… = 1 + <em>i </em>+ <em>i</em> ² (1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² (1 + <em>i</em> ))
… = 1 + <em>i</em> + (-1) (1 + <em>i</em> + (-1) (1 + <em>i</em> ))
… = 1 + <em>i</em> + (-1) (1 + <em>i</em> - 1 - <em>i</em> )
… = 1 + <em>i</em>
<em />
Alternatively, notice that
1 - <em>i</em> ⁶ = (1 - <em>i</em> ) (1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² + <em>i</em> ³ + <em>i</em> ⁴ + <em>i</em> ⁵)
so that
1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² + <em>i</em> ³ + <em>i</em> ⁴ + <em>i</em> ⁵ = (1 - <em>i</em> ⁶) / (1 - <em>i</em> )
Now, <em>i</em> ⁶ = (<em>i</em> ²)³ = (-1)³ = -1, so
1 + <em>i</em> + <em>i</em> ² + <em>i</em> ³ + <em>i</em> ⁴ + <em>i</em> ⁵ = (1 - (-1)) / (1 - <em>i</em> )
… = 2 / (1 - <em>i</em> )
Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of 1 - <em>i</em> :
… = 2 (1 + <em>i</em> ) / ((1 - <em>i</em> ) (1 + <em>i</em> ))
… = 2 (1 + <em>i</em> ) / (1² - <em>i</em> ²)
… = 2 (1 + <em>i</em> ) / (1 + 1)
… = 1 + <em>i</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer: the second one, aan article from www.europeanhistory.net that was updated in 2008.
i’d say an article in the Journal of European History
This source isn't very recent (but it doesnt need to be because Amaya is writing about the history of Europe), but we do know that it was updated, which implies that more relevent information was posted. The information is coming from a trustworthy source (we know this because of the url the article is from), so is likely very relevent and relaible. The last source is irrelevent becasue it's abput a carmaker who had/has nothing to do with the Columbian Exchange, and the first source is from a journal (we don't know who the journal belongs to, or what kind of information is in it).
