Question

In 2011, a government commission in Chile approved a $7 billion project. The money was for the construction of five dams across two rivers. Supporters of the dams said that Chile needed them. The dams would help the country grow out of poverty. Opponents, however, pointed out that the dams would have damaged untouched wilderness areas. In 2012, the Supreme Court in Chile blocked the project. The court wanted more research into the dams' impact. Opponents of the dams believe that Chile should develop other forms of energy. The year-round sun of its northern deserts is ideal for producing solar power. Chile could also harness wind power from the gusts along its long Pacific coast.
Do It!

Opponents want the government to consider _________.

Press enter to interact with the item, and press tab button or down arrow until reaching the Submit button once the item is selected
A regulations
B alternatives
C laborers
D discounts

Answer 1

The inference is that the opponents want the government to consider B. alternatives.

What is an inference?

It should be noted that an inference is the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given.

It was stated that the government commission in Chile approved a $7 billion project and that the money was for the construction of five dams across two rivers.

In this case, the dams would help the country grow out of poverty. Opponents, however, pointed out that the dams would have damaged untouched wilderness areas.

Therefore, the Supreme Court in Chile blocked the project. The court wanted more research into the dams' impact. This showed that there should be other alternatives. This implies that they want something different.

In conclusion, the correct option is B.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1