The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a 0.9844 = 98.44% probability that bohan goes to café georgia for a coffee today.
For each friend, there are only two possible outcomes, either they go to the cafe, or they do not. The probability of a friend going to the cafe is independent of any other friend, hence, the binomial distribution is used to solve this question.
<h3>What is the binomial distribution formula?</h3>
The formula is:
The parameters are:
- x is the number of successes.
- n is the number of trials.
- p is the probability of a success on a single trial.
In this problem:
- There are 3 friends, hence n = 3.
- They all go to the cafe with a 3/4 probability, hence p = 3/4 = 0.75.
The probability at least one goes is:
In which:
Then:
0.9844 = 98.44% probability that bohan goes to café georgia for a coffee today.
You can learn more about the binomial distribution at brainly.com/question/24863377
Answer:
0, or 1
Explanation:
Depends on if you asked for your blood type, which they will HAVE to draw your blood. Otherwise, any regular visit to the doctor will not require to draw your blood if it's a checkup. Though for certain visits/testing blood may be required to get drawn once- unless there is a problem during the drawing process. Hope this helped!
I think it’s B
Hope that helps!
Answer:
“Norma closed her eyes. Fifty thousand doallars, she thought.” (Paragraph 69)
Explanation: I had this assignment as well :)
