The payback period is 4.06 years.
<h3>What is the payback period?</h3>
Payback calculates the amount of time it takes to recover the amount invested in a project from it cumulative cash flows
Amount recovered in the first year = 46,700 - 10,000 = 36,700
Number of years it would take to recover 36,700 = 1 + (36700 / 12,000) = 4.06 years
To learn more about the payback period, please check: brainly.com/question/25716359
#SPJ1
Answer:
The additional sale will not conflict with regular sales.
Explanation:
Accept business at a special price if the additional sales conflict regular sales. That is, special price must maintain the status quo or improve it.
Answer:
D. organizational
Explanation:
You must focus on both your personal life and profession. Just got the question right on apex.
Answer:
The overview of the give scenario is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
- The distinction between Floor as well as Function Inspection was that these techniques are being used to eliminate and locate faulty materials until the identical happens in manufacturing. Quality is the key objective of both processes, where expectations are reviewed and evaluated to ensure that the operation is carried out correctly.
- The differences between the parties would be that the system in the Floor Inspection needs to be checked the content in the process mostly on the machine rather than at the beginning of manufacture to ensure that every device or floor is functioning correctly. This would be to ensure that the industrial automation expenses will not go out and then go hand in hand as well as the fault could've been readily identified.
- But from the other side, the Functional evaluation could have the primary purpose verified, which is something the brand is motivated to deliver. For example, an electric motor could've been verified if it has the correct performance and reliability. It doesn't inform us more about the difference throughout all sections, but somehow it provides everyone a wider understanding of both the happiness that comes from inspecting the very same item.
Answer:
The answer is: 4) More frequently than not, the three objectives are compatible.
Explanation:
Toyota is famous for its Just in Time (JIT) management. They are the absolute kings of efficient supply chain management and they were able to do it by making the three objectives compatible. That doesn't mean that they all have to be dealt with at the same time and with the same intensity.
Toyota's first goal was to reduce costs and in order to reduce costs they had to increase their inventory turnover. Then they discovered that in order to keep increasing inventory turnover, they had to compress their cycle time. When they were able to compress their cycle time, their turnover increased even more and their costs were lowered. The system produces continuous feedback and their efficiency keeps increasing.
I once visited one of their factories that produces almost 500 pickup trucks per day and every single work station had available inventory for only 4 trucks; only 4 engines, 16 doors, etc. It is amazing how they do it considering that every 3 minutes one truck is fully produced.
The three objectives are not only compatible, but they are absolutely necessary for the SCM to be effective.
