1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
15

Frida Kahlo, painting "The Two Fridas"was the first large-scale work done by Kahlo and is considered one of her most notable pai

ntings. It is a double self-portrait, depicting two versions of Kahlo seated together. One is wearing a white European-style Victorian dress while the other is wearing a traditional Tehuana dress.The painting was created in 1939, the same year that Kahlo divorced her husband Diego Rivera. Describe how her graphic representation of her physical body represents a deeper psychological space. Why do you think she has the two versions of herself dressed in these traditional outfits and is this visual information related to her internal body?
Arts
1 answer:
Arte-miy333 [17]3 years ago
5 0

The Two Fridas (Las dos Fridas in Spanish) is an oil painting by Mexican artist Frida Kahlo. The painting was the first large-scale work done by Kahlo and is considered one of her most notable paintings.[1] It is a double self-portrait, depicting two versions of Kahlo seated together. One is wearing a white European-style Victorian dress while the other is wearing a traditional Tehuana dress.[1] The painting was created in 1939, the same year that Kahlo divorced Diego Rivera,[1] although they remarried a year later.

Some art historians have suggested that the two figures in the painting are a representation of Frida's dual heritage.[2] Her father, Guillermo Kahlo, was German; while her mother, Matilde Calderon, was Mestizo (a mix of Spanish and Native American).[3] Another interpretation is that the Tehuana Frida is the one who was adored by her husband Diego Rivera, while the European Frida is the one that was rejected by him.[4] In Frida's own recollection, the image is of a memory of a childhood imaginary friend.[5]

Both Fridas hold items in their lap; the Mexican Frida holds a small portrait of Diego Rivera, and the European Frida holds forceps. Blood spills onto the European Frida's white dress from a broken blood vessel that has been cut by the forceps. The blood vessel connects the two Fridas, winding its way from their hands through their hearts.[6] The work alludes to Kahlo's life of constant pain and surgical procedures and the Aztec tradition of human sacrifice.[6] Because this piece was completed by Kahlo shortly after her divorce, the European Frida is missing a piece of herself, her Diego.[4]

According to Kahlo's friend, Fernando Gamboa, the painting was inspired by two paintings that Kahlo saw earlier that year at the Louvre, Théodore Chassériau's The Two Sisters and the anonymous Gabrielle d'Estrées and One of Her Sisters.[7]

You might be interested in
Identify and describe each example of michelangelo’s art
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Euthyphro

Sophist and religious scholar of Athens

Euthyphro opens with the argument that 'Good is what is Holy'. He argues that sentient beings (people) are flawed and make bad judgments, whereas Gods are superior and possess far more wisdom than us; therefore what they command must be good. This can be refuted by pointing out that there are many different Gods, each of whom have different ideas of what is Good, thus making the Gods impossible to use as a source of morality.

Euthyphro's next argument is that what all the Gods agree upon is good. For example, most deities agree that it is wrong to kill a man without a cause. By asking Euthyphro to back this up you can cause the thinker to spout the same circular argument that the non-virtual Socrates did by posing to him the Euthyphro dilemma: 'What the Gods Agree Upon is Always Good' vs. 'If Things are Good, the Gods Will Agree on Them'. This demolishes Euthyphro's argument as it is shown that in order for what the Gods command to benefit mankind, the actions they command must have value rooted externally.

Protagoras

Sophist of Athens

Protagoras argues that 'The Source of Morality is the Self'. His reasoning for this is a simple logical elimination. The conversation with Euthyphro has already proven that morality doesn't come from the Gods, while Protagoras believes it unlikely that morality could come from rocks and trees, because, as a system that governs the actions of humans, it makes little sense that it would originate from our surroundings. This leads him to the idea that 'Morality is up to the Individual' as the only possible remaining option; an assumption that you point out to be flawed as there is always the possibility that alternatives have been overlooked.

Protagoras goes on to declare that there is nothing upon which everyone can agree and 'Whatever an Individual Believes to be Right is Right', which he backs up by saying that people disagreed on most issues in Athenian Democracy, and that there were even those who argued that 'Those who Speak out Should be Put to Death'. This is easily rebutted as you claim that in extreme cases such as these, the values of an individual can indeed be wrong. The evidence for this is that if Free Speech was punished, Science and Philosophy would be no more and society would cease to advance; thus morality can't be determined entirely by the individual.

Protagoras is then forced to put forth that 'All Morals are Subjective', meaning that they are dependent on situation. While it is agreed that this is an interesting thought, it acknowledges that there are factors other than the individual that affect morality, undermining his entire philosophy.

Thomas Hobbes

Political Philosopher and Author of Leviathan

Hobbes' reasoning is based upon his premise of 'The Natural Condition of Mankind', the substance of which is that men are selfish and in competition for the resources necessary for survival. This creates a 'Constant State of War' with all other men and in such a state there is no morality. Of course, this explains very little in terms of the complex societies that we live in today and can be refuted by simply remarking that people often work together in order to further the overall good in the world. For example, builders working together to build a house or philosophers working together to find the truth.

Hobbes affirms this, stressing that, despite there being no morality in the state of nature, it is our sense of morality that allows us to co-operate in such a fashion. He claims that this sense of morality is born through 'The Social Contract'. Hobbes supports this by offering that since the natural state is an extremely uncomfortable way of living, with no assurance of man's most fundamental self-interest of survival, mankind is impelled to seek peace through the formation of social contracts between individuals, each agreeing to give up some of our personal freedoms, most notably our freedom to harm, in exchange for greater security. This seems to be somewhat of a contradiction in that the theory is based upon the idea that mankind is selfish and will go to any lengths to improve their own prosperity. As the only benefits of the social contract originate from others giving up their rights, if people are as selfish as he claims, what is there to stop individuals from breaking a contract to seek the most advantageous situation; to keep their

Explanation:

this is more then you needed and may not even be what you need but i am sure you will end up useing it

3 0
3 years ago
Do you guys like the image? I created it. P.S first person add answer get brainliest
Serhud [2]

I like it but R.I.P :(

3 0
3 years ago
What category of folk music includes dance music?
Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

i think the answer is activity song

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can some try to help me
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

wouldn't it be all of the above!? bc yes it def uses music and sound effects

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the following question in 3-4 complete sentences.
sasho [114]

Answer:

Myths are not true stories and are usually passed down from generation to generation.

A legend is a story of a certain person, supernatural entity and the like.

A visual metaphor is representation of a thing, object, place or person by way of visual image that suggests or shows relativity or similarity with something or someone.

A belief is could not be true to all but could be accepted as a fact within a certain group of people, culture or individual.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a significant result of michelangelo's david?
    10·1 answer
  • Submit your reflection on Fritz koenig’s sphere
    12·1 answer
  • Which materials did Egyptian artists use for decorating their art
    9·2 answers
  • Formal analysis can be done on paintings, but not on sculptures. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    6·1 answer
  • Who wants to talk?
    9·2 answers
  • Señala si las afirmaciones son verdaderas o falsas:
    15·1 answer
  • Evelyn made a mistake in the rhythm and solfege of the song. Where was her mistake? How can she fix it the next time she sings "
    9·1 answer
  • Most people don't realize how much blank can effect your voice quality ​
    12·1 answer
  • I need help with this question: Why do I have bad timing?
    15·2 answers
  • All of these bands were one-hit wonders EXCEPT:
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!