Answer:
yes i do because his ideas are great and that is what needs to be done
Explanation:
All gladiators in ancient Rome were Men, False
The emperor gave a thumbs up or down to decide the fate of the defeated gladiators, True
Romans feasted until they were full, then visited a room called a vomitorium to vomit the food out so they can start over again. True
Plebeians in Rome were the common or poorest people, True
Caesar's last words during his assassination were "Et tu, Brute", True
<h3>Who was Julius Caesar?</h3>
Julius Caesar was a Roman Stateman and General, served the Roman army and became the dictator, he ruled the Roman empire for 5 years from 49 BC to 44 BC till his assassination where his last words were "Et tu, Brute". All gladiators in ancient Rome were not Men, it is doubtful that some females were also gladiators. So the first statement is false while the rest are true.
Learn more about Julius Caesar at brainly.com/question/27177838
#SPJ1
Answer:
folloow mw tiktokjonathan_dion for a free cookie
Explanation:
Answer: Scaffolding
Explanation:Scaffolding refers to the fact that parents can provide a structure that can assist children as they develop new skilss. The idea of this concept is that a framework or structure can help children learn new skills effectively especially those skills that are seems to be beyond those that they already have which may be difficult to crack when they don't alone. This means a parent plays a role in the development of their children which can even help them with social interaction. For example a parent can model out a problem that can arise during a play and resolve it along with the child to equip the child with proper skills to solve future conflicts.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: In his essay: "The Laboring Classes" Orestes Brownson argued that:___, would be, C: Wealth and labor were at war.
Explanation:
"The Laboring Classes" is an essay that was written by American author Orestes A. Brownson and it was first published in the Boston Quarterly Review, in 1840. The essay is a text that Brownson published before his conversion into Catholicism in 1844 and it is a pretty powerful critique to the effects that capitalism has had on the living conditions of laborers. Although he mentions the effects of Chartism, a series of legislations that were passed in England in 1837, and savagely critiques certain social movements, especially when it comes to laborers and social equality, in the end he shows that the labor movements, and social instability present not just in England, but in other parts of the world, comes mostly from the difficult situations that laborers are having to face in the world order of his day, while business owners ignored the welfare of their workers for the sake of incrementing their gain. This is why the answer is C.
