Answer:
Self-Concept
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Katrina's understanding of herself would be called her Self-Concept. This term refers to a perception of ones-self or in other words the way we see ourselves based on behavior, unique characteristics, and our abilities. Which is what Katrina is using to describe the kind of person that she is.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Greek underworld unlike the Christian Hell is a kingdom. In Greek mythology is told that the underworld was ruled by Hades and his wife and they both ruled the kingdom of dead (unlike the Christian hell that is ruled by Satan). As a kingdom, the Greek hell had various “popular spaces” as the five rivers that travel through the underworld that helps divide it into four regions; it also has fields and meadows for the souls that live there. In Christian hell it’s thought that only bad people that had done bad actions while living go through hell, thou in Greek hell, they thought that everyone, no matter your actions, end up in the underworld. The closest description of Christian hell would be Dante’s Inferno which describes the adventures of Dante walking in the eight circles of hell (due to the 8 deadly sins). While to enter the Greek hell, you need to pay two coins and from that point it is a transition, from the gates to some part of the underworld.
<span>The historical relationship between the Zapotec and Maya civilizations show something in common, most especially in the decline of the Zapotec and the Mayan civilizations. </span>Both civilizations declined under circumstances that are still not entirely clear to historians
The constitution was created so no one has too much power
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.
