"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
Answer:
The pandemic has caused the largest and fastest decline in international flows — including trade, foreign direct investment, and international travel — in modern history. While these numbers imply a major rollback of globalization’s recent gains, they don’t necessarily signal a fundamental collapse of international market integration. But how deep will the plunge really be? How fast can we expect global flows to rebound? And how might future flow patterns look different from the past? Leaders can find clues about the future and actionable implications for their companies by focusing on five key drivers of globalization’s trajectory: 1) global growth patterns; 2) supply-chain policies; 3) superpower frictions and fragility; 4) ongoing technical shifts; and 5) my opinion
Explanation:
Answer:
Diffusion of responsability.
Explanation:
This is a sociopsychological phenomenon in which an individual is less likely to take action or responsibility for an action or inaction when there are others present. The individual, thereby, assumes that others will take action.
This is what Kayla is thinking and experiencing when she sees the old man stumbling. She assumed that someone else would help the old man.
Answer:
B
Explanation
becuase the bird cannot fly without applying force
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. He helped negotiate peace <span>agreements between Israeli and PLO leaders. C. He helped bring about a stock-market surge, low unemployment, minimal inflation, and general prosperity. D. He supported a welfare reform billed that increased the number of people receiving welfare."</span>
