Answer:
City States are simple - Cities that are their own state
Explanation:
City States were usually like their own little colony. Greece was not fully united and these City States had their own government and everything. They were almost always at war with each others because the wanted more power and with the lack of a real government behind greece, there was much to be taken. The geography of greece made these City States even more valuable because there were not many great places that had the resources or these city states.
These rules reflect our societal emphasis on <u>incest taboo.</u>
<h3>What is incest taboo?</h3>
Incest taboo occur when a person that are blood related marry each other or when family members date or marry each others. Incest taboo forbid any form of sexual relationship among people that are blood related.
Hence, In most states in the United States, an individual is allowed to marry a parent, a sibling, an aunt or an uncle, a grandparent, or a first or second cousin. As this rules reflect our societal emphasis on incest taboo.
Learn more about incest taboo here:brainly.com/question/15361129
#SPJ1
Ethnocentrism- evaluation of other cultures according to preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of ones own culture.
Answer:
Native American populations declined rapidly due to a lack of immunity to disease
Explanation:
At that time, many Europeans who came to American continent carried out viruses that could cause diseases such as smallpox, influenza, and measles within their body.
When they "Encountered" The native Americans, these viruses passed on to the Natives and infected them.
Because the natives have lack of immunity to disease (they never experienced diseases like that in their life) , the effect to their body is much greater compared to the Europeans. This led to large amount of death among Native Americans.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.