Answer:
Ensuring products are well below the going market rate.
Quality of products offered.
Efforts to improve the lives of members.
Explanation:
Answer:
C) Company 1 sold their bonds at 94 and redeemed them at 106.
Explanation:
The face value of bond issued in 4 companies are same, then it's clearly that the company 1 will have the lowest carrying value on their bonds because they sold at lowest price but buy back (redeem) at highest prices.
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
In United states:
Can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 250 ÷ 25
= 10 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 25 ÷ 250
= 0.1 tons of steel
In Japan:
Can produce 30 tons of steel or 275 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 275 ÷ 30
= 9.17 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 30 ÷ 275
= 0.11
Therefore,
United States has a comparative advantage in producing automobiles because the opportunity cost of producing automobiles is lower than the Japan.
Japan has a comparative advantage in producing steel because the opportunity cost of producing steel is lower than the United states.
Answer: Company should not expand to either.
Explanation:
Find the expected values of expanding to either country and pick the country with the highest expected value:
China:
= ∑(Probability of outcome * Outcome)
= (20% * 2,000,000) + (30% * 1,000,000) + (50% * -2,000,000)
= -$300,000
Vietnam:
= (70% * 1,000,000) + (30% * -2,500,000)
= -$50,000
<em>Both countries result in an expected loss so company should not expand to either of them. </em>
Thank you for the points man ;)
