Answer: A. If Kemala willingly choses to work at the factory, the factory job may provide her with a better outcome than any of her next best alternatives.
Explanation:
Going by standards in the United States, the wages that Kemala is earning may be tagged as exploitative. If however, it is shown that Kamala works in that factory of her own accord, then it means that the wage is not exploitative to her because she must be earning more from the factory than other alternatives to it which was why she chose to work there.
It would simple mean that the wages in Indonesia are small by American standards and not just the ones Kemala is receiving from the factory.
Answer:
To determine the total amount of money that I will have in my account at the time of my retirement, we must consider the total amount paid into the PIMCO account during the last 15 years, and add to this value the potential amount to be paid in the next 20 years in the Vanguard account.
Thus, during the previous 15 years, I have deposited 700 dollars per month in my PIMCO account, with which I have a cumulative total of $ 126,000 (700x12x15). Also, I will potentially deposit another $ 168,000 (700x12x20) in the Vanguard account for the next 20 years.
Therefore, over the 35 years of savings, once the time has come to retire, I will have $ 294,000 in my retirement investment.
Answer: reciprocity
Explanation: In simple words, reciprocity refers to the agreement in which two parties exchange goods or services in such a way that both of them will gain benefit from such agreement.
In business it can achieved in many ways, for example by combining the efforts and resources or by providing each other some service in exchange for service from the other side.
In the given case, Jason made a deal with dodge to provide service to him in exchange for service by him. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts reciprocity.
The government will be able to improve the road system, encouraging more people to drive on vacations. Social Security benefits will provide income for the elderly and disabled, allowing them to spend money, thus boosting the economy. Airline security might be slightly improved because of the ability to hire, but there will not be enough money to provide the latest equipment.
Answer:
The answer is: a
Explanation:
The Parton Company has a 'make or buy' decision. This decision involves analysing the incremental costs associated with each option. Incremental costs are costs incurred as a result of producing one more unit of a product. If the excess capacity can be utilised to produce the headlights at a lower cost than the cost of acquiring the headlights from an external supplier, then the company should produce the headlights.
The Parton Company incurs $12.80 per headlight purchased from the external supplier. Added to this cost, are the existing costs of operating below plant capacity. If making the headlights in the manufacturing plant yields a positive contribution to fixed costs, then the Parton company should produce the headlights in the manufacturing plant.
By producing the headlights, the Parton company gains a contribution to fixed costs of $1.03 per headlight.
Foregone purchase costs from supplier: $12.80
Incurred costs (directly) from production: ($11.77)
Direct materials ($4.45)
Direct Labour ($3.45)
Manufacturing Overheads: $(6.45*0.6) <u>($3.87)</u>
Net gain per headlight <u> </u><u>$1.03</u>
