Answer:
Negative effects of the Mongol Empire's expansion into Western europe, East Asia, include the wiping out of people that resisted given the violent nature of their invasions.
Positive effects include a century of peace those under under Mongol rule. This stability allowed for the reopening of the Silk Road trading routes between China and Europe, increasing cultural exchange and wealth all along the trade paths including Western Africa, East Asia and Europe.
Some of the inventions that revolutionized American life in the late 1800s are:
- Telephone. <span>Alexander Graham Bell invented the “electric speech machine,” or telephone, in 1876 which revolutionized the way people speak and communicate to people.
-QWERTY. </span><span>The QWERTY is the most used keyboard nowadays. It was created by Christopher L. Shole in 1874. He is the one who introduced the QWERTY keyboard to the world.
- American Football. American Football is nowadays one of the biggest sport of the United States. The invention of it was credited to Walter Camp. The first professional game of football was held in 1892.
- Skyscraper. The first skyscraper, known as the 10-story Home Insurance Company Building in Chicago was designed by architect William Le Baron Jenney. </span>
<h3 /><h3>just free your mind drink water and go outside take fresh air you will get answers.</h3><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3>This a best method to solve the answer.I hope it is helpful</h3>
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
