PLEASE HELP! I'LL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!

2 answers:

7 0

Answer - You are looking for why they were considered radical, what was radical about the form and content of their work.
We know both writers were considered radical because of their take on identity; especially Gender, political, sexual and religious “Christian” identity.
Emily Dickinson’s and Walt Whitman’s poetry deal with the same themes, where Emily Dickinson’s poems are short, strictly metered and seem anti-American Walt Whitman’s are free verse and patriotic. Whitman celebrates the American way in anthem like poetry and Dickinson’s are more critical, more defiant to class and culture.

Masja [62]2 years ago

3 0

The major difference with Emily and Walt was that Emily had short and seemingly simple poems. But Walt's poems were long and often complex. ... Also Whitman uses lengthy and wordy descriptions in his poetry, but Dickinson is very straight to the point.

You might be interested in

Can someone please help me

gavmur [86]

Hello,

1. is tiger, fighter, fire

2. fighter, fire

3. roar ans champion

4. i went from zero, to my own hero

hope this helps

Please mark me as Brainliest

4 0

3 years ago

Act 2 Scene 6How has Juliet explained the visit to the Friar to her family?

tatuchka [14]

Answer:

She told her family that she had to go for a confession to the church.

Explanation:

In Christianity, especially Catholics, confessions are used as a means of absolving one's sinful ways through the priests. A person can go to the church and confess in the confessional booth to the priest who ill act as an intermediary for the person to God.

In William Shakespeare's "Rome and Juliet", Romeo and Juliet had fallen in love but due to the family feud between their two families, they aren't allowed to be together. So, they hatched a plan along with Friar Lawrence to get them married so that they will be together. For this to happen, they have to get married in secret. So, Juliet told her family that she has to go t the church for a confessional session with Friar Lawrence. But in reality, she was to be married to Romeo. This is just an excuse which will not arouse any suspicion on her act.

4 0

3 years ago

In a situation comedy

matrenka [14]

Answer:

ok, que genial y cuál es la comedia....

3 0

3 years ago

• clear position statement

mrs_skeptik [129]

I think it's Persuasive..because it appeals to our emotions by getting us to agree with them, and it uses reason and logic to do so, and often uses statistics....and there's almost always a clear statement of what they want us to believe at the beginning

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

for the narrator of red badge of courage, henry fleming, rebelled against his mother to join the army. is rebellion a useful tra

balu736 [363]

The characters in the Hunger Games that rebelled against the government were being killed for what they were doing and very few people wanted to side with them because they knew it was against the law. The characters stuck to the plan, though. They rebelled and disobeyed and fought the authorities. In the end, they won and were able to defeat the bad government in order to progress into a better country. Rebellion comes a great cost. Hundreds of people died on both sides in order for the bad situation to be made better. The country became great and a happy, equal place because a single group had the courage to break the law in hope for a better life.

People need to question their authorities because they aren’t always right. If people let government, authorities, or any leader have total say and control then it becomes a dictatorship. People question the laws and the authority and it makes people reconsider what they have always known to be true. If someone can hear another side, they can consider that side and maybe change their mind. There are two sides to every story and sometimes it only takes the acknowledgement of the other side for people to see the wrongness of the current system. Once the other side is recognized, two sides can talk about it and come to a better, middle-road decision. If the government refuses to come to a compromise or is unwilling to listen, people have every right to fight. Even in the Bible, Christians are given the ability and responsibility to revolt against a government that goes against God’s will. It’s the responsibility of the people to make sure we are doing God’s will and pleasing Him in the world. For the good of society, people have to stand up for what they believe is right so that others can chose what they believe and, if they are inclined, they can fight, too. It’s up to the people to fight for what’s right and, in doing so, promote a better place to live in. So i see rebellion as a useful trait in this situations.

8 0

3 years ago