The correct answer would be alternative A) "most of those increases in agriculture are cash crops reserved for export."
The increase of production of crops doesn't benefit the hungry, as the crops are not meant for them. They're destined to exportation. For this reason, the hungry don't get anything from the increase in production.
One of the ways to prevent hunger in developing countries would be to have this crops used for social programs, and distribute food to the hungry. However, that's not the way it's done.
Germany after WWI didn't have a lot of pride in their nation
(nationalism) and Hitler promised to restore Germany to its former
glory
The two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
<h3>What is first amendment?</h3>
The first amendment was made in the year 1791. It protects a lot of the civil rights which include: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and so on.
Since the first amendment protects the freedom of speech we can conclude by saying that the two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment are:
- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society
- The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war
Read more on first amendments here: brainly.com/question/325850
#SPJ1
Answer:
industrial pollution, sewage pollution
The 5th amendments is due process.
