Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
![\frac{MU_x}{P_x}=\frac{MU_y}{P_y}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BMU_x%7D%7BP_x%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BMU_y%7D%7BP_y%7D)
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
![\frac{4}{1}>\frac{6}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B1%7D%3E%5Cfrac%7B6%7D%7B2%7D)
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
<span>The relational view of competitive advantage is a strategic management framework that proposes that critical resources and capabilities frequently are embedded in strategic alliances that span firm boundaries. The strategic management framework has an enhanced capacity with a much broad focus of the yearly budget process and a strengthened key management.</span>
Answer:
The Money supply will decrease by $4,500
Explanation:
What will be the maximum impact on money supply today as a result of your action is that the Money supply will decrease by $4,500.
Since we assumed that you have $10,000 in your account in which you withdraw $500 cash from your account and hide it under your pillow for future use, therefore based this scenario or actions carried by you it means that your bank have fewer or lesser funds available to make loans which means the decrease will tend to affect the money supply.
Hence, you can easily calculate the effect by using the simple money multiplier.
option C to persuade, just took the test
A car purchase would be an example of a short term financial goal.