A company in monopolistic opposition produces an allocatively green output degree even as a company in best opposition produces a productively green output degree.
The long-run equilibrium answer in monopolistic opposition usually produces 0 monetary income at a factor to the left of the minimal of the common overall value curve. The life of excessive limitations to access prevents corporations from coming into the marketplace even withinside the long run.
Therefore, it's far viable for the monopolist to keep away from opposition and hold making tremendous monetary income withinside the long run. One feature of a monopolist is that it's far a income maximizer. Since there's no opposition in a monopolistic marketplace, a monopolist can manage the charge and the amount demanded. The degree of output that maximizes a monopoly's income is calculated through equating its marginal value to its marginal revenue.
Learn more about company in monopolistic here:
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
The change that would encourage GDP growth to slow is the automobile industry reduces hours for factory workers.
<h3>What would cause GDP growth to slow?</h3>
Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year
If the hours of work for factory workers is reduced, output would be reduced and this would slow GDP growth.
To learn more about GDP, please check: brainly.com/question/15225458
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. So we know that the entry has been posted.
Explanation:
- The posting reference are entered in the journal entries are done so as to find them in the account ledgers and these entres are post in the this account is insert to keep and store the booking entry for the balance sheets and includes the incomes statements and accounts like the receivables and the accounts payable and accrued expenses also.
<span>Tony did not breach a contract because it was all up to Lorene and who she wanted to go with. Lorene is not obligated to go with either. Although Bill spent most of his allowance, he could still ask someone else, sell his ticket and or even go by himself. I do not think Tony could be held liable even if he knew. It was not a nice thing to flake on Bill, but ultimately, it was Lorene's decision to make.</span>
