Answer:
The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)
Explanation:
d
Answer:
The option that runs contrary to the classical theory of criminology is (A) Punishment should be certain
Explanation:
The key principle of Classical theory Of Criminology are
- <u>Rationality</u>:-This principle states that people commit crime at their own wish/will.
- <u>Hedonism</u>:The principle of hedoism states that people seek pleasure and minimize their pain by committing crime.
- <u>Punishment </u>:As per this principle punishment work as a deterrent to crime.
- <u>Human Right:</u>This principle states that the punishment given should not be harsh rather it should be swift.
The answer of the above question is (A) Punishments should be certain.
The answer is D, brainliest?
Answer:
27) define normative ethics as “theories of ethics that are concerned with the norms, standards or criteria that define principles of ethical behaviour.” The most common examples of normative ethical theories are utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics (deontology), and divine command theory, which are described ...
<u>Answer:</u>
In Court, Jurisdiction is a major power to permit authority over things and individuals within a certain territory. This means that the Court has the power to decide or hear a lawsuit or a case.
<u>In the case of Federal Courts, the court can have the right to Jurisdiction in the following cases:</u>
- Maritime, patent, copyright, and Bankruptcy cases.
- Cases in which there has been a violation of the constitutional or federal laws of the country.
- Cases in which the country itself is directly involved.
- Cases between the citizens or individuals from a different country if the money in the case surpasses $75,000.
